<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Kid on the Block</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandedwithlove.com/2007/12/12/new-kid-on-the-block/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandedwithlove.com/2007/12/12/new-kid-on-the-block/</link>
	<description>Creativity. Media. God. Faith. Design. Life. Family.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.brandedwithlove.com/2007/12/12/new-kid-on-the-block/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandedwithlove.com/?p=65#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Competition is great. That&#039;s why I greet iworship with a smile because it is going to cause other presentation softwares (media shout, easy worship, pro presenter, etc.) to up their game a create cutting edge programs for presenting in a corporate setting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Competition is great. That&#8217;s why I greet iworship with a smile because it is going to cause other presentation softwares (media shout, easy worship, pro presenter, etc.) to up their game a create cutting edge programs for presenting in a corporate setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.brandedwithlove.com/2007/12/12/new-kid-on-the-block/comment-page-1/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandedwithlove.com/?p=65#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>Competition is great. That&#039;s why I greet iworship with a smile because it is going to cause other presentation softwares (media shout, easy worship, pro presenter, etc.) to up their game a create cutting edge programs for presenting in a corporate setting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Competition is great. That&#8217;s why I greet iworship with a smile because it is going to cause other presentation softwares (media shout, easy worship, pro presenter, etc.) to up their game a create cutting edge programs for presenting in a corporate setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.brandedwithlove.com/2007/12/12/new-kid-on-the-block/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandedwithlove.com/?p=65#comment-17</guid>
		<description>No cross dissolve of video is somewhat of a draw back.  I really could care less however about scripture support or song automation or countdown timer.  I buy my own video loops anyway because the ones bundled for free always don&#039;t quite cut it on a professional level.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In my humble opinion the interface simplicity is well worth the cost of the program and some.  New features aren&#039;t that great when you don&#039;t know how to use them ... or if the program is constantly crashing.  I would much rather wait for the few features it doesn&#039;t have.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Oh and you didn&#039;t mention .Mac Backup support, importing songs from Word documents, and live camera support just off the top of my head (all of which are highly useful in my opinion)  ProPresenter didn&#039;t have DVD playback until after iWorship beta was out.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So don&#039;t count iWorship out as even in it&#039;s current form it is a big leap over what PP offers.  ProPresenter has a lot of catching up to do with the interface and no doubt we will be seeing them implementing some of iWorship&#039;s features within the next few months.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Competition is good in my opinion.  Keeps us away from a monopoly and keeps everyone constantly trying to look for new ways to innovate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No cross dissolve of video is somewhat of a draw back.  I really could care less however about scripture support or song automation or countdown timer.  I buy my own video loops anyway because the ones bundled for free always don&#8217;t quite cut it on a professional level.</p>
<p>In my humble opinion the interface simplicity is well worth the cost of the program and some.  New features aren&#8217;t that great when you don&#8217;t know how to use them &#8230; or if the program is constantly crashing.  I would much rather wait for the few features it doesn&#8217;t have.</p>
<p>Oh and you didn&#8217;t mention .Mac Backup support, importing songs from Word documents, and live camera support just off the top of my head (all of which are highly useful in my opinion)  ProPresenter didn&#8217;t have DVD playback until after iWorship beta was out.</p>
<p>So don&#8217;t count iWorship out as even in it&#8217;s current form it is a big leap over what PP offers.  ProPresenter has a lot of catching up to do with the interface and no doubt we will be seeing them implementing some of iWorship&#8217;s features within the next few months.</p>
<p>Competition is good in my opinion.  Keeps us away from a monopoly and keeps everyone constantly trying to look for new ways to innovate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.brandedwithlove.com/2007/12/12/new-kid-on-the-block/comment-page-1/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandedwithlove.com/?p=65#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>No cross dissolve of video is somewhat of a draw back.  I really could care less however about scripture support or song automation or countdown timer.  I buy my own video loops anyway because the ones bundled for free always don&#039;t quite cut it on a professional level.In my humble opinion the interface simplicity is well worth the cost of the program and some.  New features aren&#039;t that great when you don&#039;t know how to use them ... or if the program is constantly crashing.  I would much rather wait for the few features it doesn&#039;t have.Oh and you didn&#039;t mention .Mac Backup support, importing songs from Word documents, and live camera support just off the top of my head (all of which are highly useful in my opinion)  ProPresenter didn&#039;t have DVD playback until after iWorship beta was out.So don&#039;t count iWorship out as even in it&#039;s current form it is a big leap over what PP offers.  ProPresenter has a lot of catching up to do with the interface and no doubt we will be seeing them implementing some of iWorship&#039;s features within the next few months.Competition is good in my opinion.  Keeps us away from a monopoly and keeps everyone constantly trying to look for new ways to innovate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No cross dissolve of video is somewhat of a draw back.  I really could care less however about scripture support or song automation or countdown timer.  I buy my own video loops anyway because the ones bundled for free always don&#8217;t quite cut it on a professional level.In my humble opinion the interface simplicity is well worth the cost of the program and some.  New features aren&#8217;t that great when you don&#8217;t know how to use them &#8230; or if the program is constantly crashing.  I would much rather wait for the few features it doesn&#8217;t have.Oh and you didn&#8217;t mention .Mac Backup support, importing songs from Word documents, and live camera support just off the top of my head (all of which are highly useful in my opinion)  ProPresenter didn&#8217;t have DVD playback until after iWorship beta was out.So don&#8217;t count iWorship out as even in it&#8217;s current form it is a big leap over what PP offers.  ProPresenter has a lot of catching up to do with the interface and no doubt we will be seeing them implementing some of iWorship&#8217;s features within the next few months.Competition is good in my opinion.  Keeps us away from a monopoly and keeps everyone constantly trying to look for new ways to innovate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.brandedwithlove.com/2007/12/12/new-kid-on-the-block/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandedwithlove.com/?p=65#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I agree, they haven&#039;t packaged it well, but I am willing to give it time and see. I suspect that Renewed vision will try to compete the live video backdrop feature and include it in an update or upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, they haven&#8217;t packaged it well, but I am willing to give it time and see. I suspect that Renewed vision will try to compete the live video backdrop feature and include it in an update or upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.brandedwithlove.com/2007/12/12/new-kid-on-the-block/comment-page-1/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandedwithlove.com/?p=65#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>I agree, they haven&#039;t packaged it well, but I am willing to give it time and see. I suspect that Renewed vision will try to compete the live video backdrop feature and include it in an update or upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, they haven&#8217;t packaged it well, but I am willing to give it time and see. I suspect that Renewed vision will try to compete the live video backdrop feature and include it in an update or upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

